How Can I Create Reflective Scholars?

Featured

Chip Helps StudentAs you might’ve read in a previous post (https://njcashman.edublogs.org/?p=72), I attended the ECET2 conference in Seattle, Washington (Elevating and Celebrating Effective Teachers and Teaching) in the middle of July. While there, I attended a session entitled “Creating Reflective Scholars”, presented by Amanda Yoshida, which was all about encouraging and facilitating self-monitoring in students. Because I believe that students should take responsibility for their learning (see earlier post about grading), this appealed to me greatly. I took some notes and set them aside for awhile, just to let the ideas settle a bit, but with school starting in just a few weeks (gulp!) I needed to flesh this out a little.

What are reflective scholars? A quick search brings no solid answers, unfortunately. Currently, my students spend a lot of time attempting tasks I give them to do (the idea that they should originate these tasks is perhaps the subject of a future post?). They dutifully work the problems, do the project, etc. and then rely on me to tell me how they did. Once I do, they move on to the next task. This reminds me like what I read on a shampoo bottle (you read them, right?) wash, rinse, repeat! In this way, I am not encouraging my students to be reflective scholars. They are not thinking about how they are progressing as they work, they’re just trying to get things done. Ms. Yoshida defined them this way: “Reflective Scholars assume responsibility of their learning through reflection; they reflect on their progress toward the learning objective academically, and scholars are able to identify appropriate next steps in their learning.”

Considering my own thoughts and the ideas raised in this session, I considered how my students already kept track of their progress, but that progress was summative. The open gradebooks in Schoology (see www.schoology.com), our learning management system, (LMS) allows students to monitor grades. I know I can immediately improve this practice if what the students receive centers more on formative feedback, but that is still me reflecting to the students, not the students reflecting on their own learning. Here are some things I have used, and intend to use this year. Some I gleaned from this session, some I have used before.

Reflective responses after summative assessments

As a mathematics teacher, I give summative assessments. After each one, I ask students to respond to these questions:

1: List the questions you did correctly, and the accompanying standards or concepts. What did this test demonstrate about mastery in these areas, and what evidence is shown?

2: Toward which standards or concepts did the work on this test show progression, and how did the work show this?

3: What strategies did you use to be successful with the standards mastered? What preparation or test strategies did not work?

4: What is your plan of action (being specific here) that you will use to fully master the standards that are in progress?

While this practice seems to both fit the definition of developing reflective scholars and be effective for some of my students in helping them shape learning strategies, other students derived little benefit because they were not accustomed to thinking this way. To help, I’ve employed other strategies such as using polling through my LMS (in this case, Schoology)bbba10ce0e6d47ea1097f020d9415a66 asking students to simply rate their confidence with the topic at the end of class; using Socrative (see www.socrative.com) to ask a couple of key exit questions (can also use googleforms for this); and using journaling or discussion questions on the LMS to find out what students are thinking about their learning. There are simpler versions of this, of course, including ‘fist to five’ rating system of comfort or self-assessment of progress (see, for example,  http://tinyurl.com/pslbn23).

This school year, I intend to try some ideas I learned from the session (or the thinking it inspired).

Thank you, Missbresources.comPut a ‘learning thermometer’ in the classroom and ask students to put sticker or post-it note on it at the beginning and again at the end of class; (see missbresources.com for this thermometer)

 

Have students share their biggest or favorite ‘fail’ of the day and what they learned from it (remembering that fail is an acronym for ‘first attempt in learning’)

Use something like futureme.org, or some other email scheduler, to have students create goals for the next class, next assessment or next term;

Incorporating a technique like ‘My Favorite No” as seen in this Teaching Channel Video (https://www.teachingchannel.org/videos/class-warm-up-routine) to have students reflect on what they learn from their errors.

 

CL Society 09: Photocopies

Francisco Osorio via Compfight

Possible pitfalls If students do not see me reflecting on my progress and acknowledging my challenges they will not either. I have to walk, not just talk. Second, until students get comfortable ‘going public’ with their reflections, I need to give them opportunities to be publicly anonymous (e.g. post-it notes without names first) but privately transparent (journaling, reflective paragraphs, voxer messages, etc.) Additionally, incorporating growth mindset language in my own reflections and asking for it from students should help reinforce that success in learning mathematics requires work, perseverance, frustration and challenge. How great, though, would it be for a student to look back over their reflections to see their own journey of growth? That would be awesome!

I’d love to hear your plans for helping develop reflective scholars in your classroom, especially from other high school teachers. What has worked? What didn’t? Better yet, I’d love to connect on twitter or voxer to share those thoughts!

Shout out to Amanda Yoshida for leading this session and for widely sharing her ideas and resources! Follow her on twitter @ayoshida22.

The Grading Conundrum, Part 1

photo courtesy James M. Raymond

Grading – neither the heart nor the soul of teaching

So recently I was having conversations about grading, college admissions, value-added education, student effort, and the like. The central question is this – am I ‘beating up my students’ with my grading? Are the students and I using tons of effort, learning quite a bit, only to end up with C+ or B- grades? Is there something more holistic?

Basic Philosophies: In the beginning…

Once upon a time, I used to grade based on points. This drove me crazy on several fronts, from deciding how many points a problem was worth, how much to deduct for each error or type of error, to trying to make the total number of points come out right. After returning a piece of work, the discussions I had with students were all about points. “Why did you take off 2 points instead of 1?” or “Susie only got 1 point off on this, but you took 3 off of mine. Why?” or “I am only 1 point from an A…can’t you find one point to give me?” The unspoken accusations of unfairness or favoritism or being a hard-line grader were taking me further and further from my goal of teaching students mathematics, and how to communicate mathematics to demonstrate their learning. Like lots of grading schemes, this was pretty arbitrary in my mind. I did this until a conference session changed my entire outlook more than 15 years ago.

Still not Standards-based, but still pretty good

I went to a session where 10 math teachers were all handed a piece of student work, and we were asked to assign a grade to it. The grades on the paper ranged from D to B+, as people used various methods (point-based or otherwise) to evaluate. The presenter showed a rubric-method in which error were categorized by type, and grades were determined based on how many errors of how many types were made. The point was that the conversations with students now would center on why the error was conceptual or procedural, rather than why points were deducted. Less arbitrary to the student, easier to discuss or defend.

Where I am now…still unsettled

I’ve been using a rubric-based system for tests, quizzes, projects, papers and the like for a long time. Students evaluate, correct and reflect on their performances, learning to view their work objectively and recognizing that the only thing being assessed is what they wrote on test day. Their communication gets better over time, they learn to try everything, and they are really proud of not making conceptual errors. They devise plans of action based on their performance, and along the way their emotions are separated from their work. So you’d think everything is going great…but then, the B-/C+ syndrome rears its ugly head.

NEXT POST: what to do with the student who tries really hard, but isn’t making grades above C+, what to do with seniors who start a term poorly, improve steadily, but still have that C+, a killer grade for college applications?

Thanks for reading. I’d love to hear your thoughts.

Read more: “5 Obstacles to Grading Reform” from ASCD.

Hey…didja ever notice that lots of blog posts have a number in the title? Why is that?

Eight Ways to Decrease Pressure and Increase Learning

I read a blog on philly.com, written by Faye Flam entitled “A Simple Solution to the Should We Teach Algebra Teaching Conundrum”.  She proposes a solution that got me thinking about a crucial question in mathematics teaching in general that seems to cause so much pain in both teachers and students.

Students (and teachers) seem to be under so much pressure all of the time, and, if we know that increased pressure creates an adverse learning environment, how do we decrease the pressure without sacrificing content?
Under Pressure
I am thinking that pressure comes in many forms for students, and for teachers. There is assessment pressure; a student’s fear of not knowing, of not studying the right thing, of just not being good enough. Students have a fear of low grades that comes from themselves, their parents, college counselors, and even school expectations. There is ever-present time pressure, both for them (I have so much to do) and me (they-didn’t-understand-what-I-did-today-then-homework-tonight-is-a-disaster-in-waiting). I feel pressure from within (I really want the students to succeed, and feel terrible if they don’t) and without (parents and school expectations.) So, here are some ideas I’m toying with using in my classroom this year, learned from recent workshops and conferences. My thanks, up front, to the Center for Innovative Teaching and Henri Picciotto.

  1. Paired or Group Assessment. Students assigned to pairs or groups of 3 to work out an assessment (standard test or quiz) together. Instead of trying to see if kids are cheating, I can watch (even record) their collaborative efforts. I think that students, knowing in advance that they will test together, may also study together. They will plan before the test, develop strategies, and hopefully focus on the mathematics. I think students will think less about grades, and will be less fearful.
  2. Separating homework from classwork. It was suggested that if kids are doing homework that is not entirely connected to what happened today in class, then there is a sense of relief on the student’s part that it is ok if they didn’t understand everything  in class. The way I’m going to try this is, as Henri Picciotto suggested, teach content item A (say, exponentials) in first week, and refer to that in homework in week 2 while I am teaching content item B (say, sequences). The two items don’t need to be connected, and may be better for the student if one doesn’t depend on the other.
  3. Using writing better: I have often employed writing in journals and reflections on tests; I believe that a class blog and individual shared documents can help me and the students identify issues and trouble spots. The research presented in the January 14, 2011 article in SCIENCE entitled ‘Writing About Testing Worries Boosts Exam Performance in the Classroom’ suggests that prior to an assessment, students do better if they write about their anxiety about the test they’re about to take, they will do better. Worth trying! (see Science, registration required to view article.)
  4. Test corrections/retesting. I thought of myself as being pretty progressive, given that I evaluate all of my tests using a rubric, and students write corrections, reflections, and a self-assessment. What I think is missing is giving students the opportunity to show mastery of the material. I am going to offer to student the opportunity to show mastery using other means, if they wish. This could be a verbal test/discussion with me, a video of themselves explaining how to do the math they need to learn, creating a tutorial for other students, etc. Time consuming, certainly, but perhaps more authentic then me rewriting a test and having them go at it.
  5. Giving them the answers, but not the solutions. My students tell me that they come up with all kinds of ways to figure out problems on homework by ‘reverse-engineering’ from the answers. So occasionally I will give them both the question and the answer, and see how they connect the two. 
  6. Use of techy-tools to give better feedback: I know about student-response systems (like Socrative, Nearpod, eclicker, etc.) and how I can use them to help students know what they know. I just need to use them!
  7. Backchanneling: Up to now, I have been terrified of the cellphone in my classroom. My time at ISTE12 taught me that I can use this tool that all the kids have, along with TodaysMeeting or PollEverywhere to ask students to give on-the-fly feedback to what is happening in class. The idea that I can go back through all of those questions (even the one that asks when the quiz is being returned) later and answer them relieves some pressure to answer every question during the class period.
  8. Keeping it positive. Sounds easy, but I tend to focus on what needs to be improved, rather than celebrating what was awesome. If I give them global reports about how they are ‘outlearning’ last year’s class or how much they’ve improved since the beginning of the unit, then I have to believe they will feel less pressure. I saw a youtube video about linking positivity to happiness, with the result being better performance by Shawn Achor (The Happiness Advantage: Linking Positive Brains to Performance ) This reaffirms the idea that getting students to focus on positivity through specific actions can shift their view about what they’re learning, and perhaps about mathematics as a subject.
What are things you do that relieve pressure on yourself, or on the students? I’d like to hear!